NelworksNelworks
Season 2

EP05 - PNG vs PDF

Understanding PNG vs PDF: raster vs vector formats. Learn about the parsing tax, AI readability, when to use each format, and the trade-off between human-readable and machine-readable documents.

Tweet coming soon
What is that?! It looks like the logo is dissolving!
Screw the graphic team! Why would they even give me this abomination?
You're using a photograph of a shape. You need the blueprint for the shape itself.
Kurumi! It's a PNG! It's supposed to be high quality!
It is. At one specific size. You have a mosaic. When you stretch it, you're just making the tiles bigger.
Try that one.
I don't get it. Why do both file types exist? Why this confusion? Why can't we just pick one and stick with it? The better one!
Because they weren't born to compete. They were born to solve two completely different, very painful problems.
PNG ancestor is the GIF, built for a world when internet still came through a telephone line. Every byte was precious.
GIF was created by CompuServe in the late 80s and became the default way to put graphics on the early web, because it used clever compression to keep images small enough for slow dial-up modems.
But Unisys, the company that held the patent on the GIF's compression algorithm, started demanding licensing fees from anyone who used it.
In response, a group of engineers and programmers across the internet banded together and created PNG—the 'Portable Network Graphics' format.
So my blurry PNG is basically an internet rebellion?
Exactly. PNG is a symbol of open technology.
PDF was born to solve a different kind of chaos.
In the early 90s, there was no guarantee a document would look the same from one computer to the next. Adobe's solution was to create a 'digital stone tablet'.
The PDF's purpose was **to preserve a document's layout perfectly, everywhere, forever.** It contains the fonts, the images, the vector blueprints, all in one self-contained box. It solved the problem of digital chaos.
I get it! PNG is for sending a simple picture. PDF is for sending a perfect document.
All our company reports, our web graphics, our documentation... if it's all PDF, it will always be perfect and scalable! I'm solving the blurry logo problem forever!
No. Do not do that. That is a terrible idea.
Why?! It's the better format!
It's better for *your* eyes. It's a nightmare for the bots.
The bots?
Shez, how does our internal search chatbot work? How does Google index our public reports? How do our AI tools analyze market data?
A PNG is a simple, honest grid of data. The AI can ingest it instantly. A PDF is a locked box of instructions. The AI has to waste immense energy just trying to reverse-engineer the document to extract the raw text and images. It's called the **Parsing Tax**.
So... if I make our annual report a PDF...
Google's search bots will have a harder time indexing the content, so our SEO ranking will drop. Our internal search bot will be slower and more likely to **hallucinate** because it struggles to pull clean facts from the complex layout.
So by making it prettier for humans, I'm making it dumber for the machines?
You're optimizing for one audience at the expense of the other. Today, the machine audience is just as important.
So... PNG for everything?
The PDF isn't going away. It will always be the king of its niche.
What niche?
That. The bridge from digital to analog. When you need to print a contract, a scientific paper, or a boarding pass and know with 100% certainty how it will look on paper, you use a PDF.
So I have to choose my audience. Is this for a human to read and admire, or for a bot to parse and understand?
This is the trade-off of the modern internet.